tatikios | 0 points
Monica Petersen was not murdered for investigating Clinton. It's all a lie made up by someone who was specifically asked not to spread untruths about Monica..
/u/rutkdn has been claiming for days now, that Bella, a friend of Monica Petersen corrobated his claims that Monica had been investigating Clinton in Haiti and that her death had been suspicious.
Here's a statement form Bella which she sent to me after I asked her on Facebook
If you want to help get Redditt to take down the thread and stop disrespecting Monica and her family. Her death had nothing to do with a Clinton conspiracy and she wasn't even researching that. The details of her death are not anyones business, this is private information that some jerk posted on Reddit after he was asked to keep it private. Monica was researching sex trafficking which is when a person pimps out a minor for prostitution, and it has nothing to do with Clinton or pedophile rings. These people have posted this crap all over redditt which is totally disrespecting the family. None of you people seem to have a clue what Monica research was about because you are so quick to jump on the trafficking narrative. Here is a audio show that interviewed Monica a few months before her death. Stop tagging Monica name into this shit. It is all over online and is upsetting to her family, especially since its not true. Episode 26: Fighting the Trafficking Narrative from
http://sexwithstrangersshow.com/episode-26-fighting-the-trafficking-narrative-from-alaska-to-rhode-island
Edit: screenshot
If you don't believe me then ASK HER YOURSELF. DO YOUR OWN INVESTIGATION BEFORE BLINDLY BELIEVING SOME ANONYMOUS GUY ON THE INTERNET.
The_Watterboy | 13 points
Can somebody please explain to me how "sex trafficking" and "pimping out minors" for sex is NOT a pedophilia ring? If you are "pimping out minors", that means you have clients; if you have clients, that means you have a network. Thats the textbook definition of a pedophilia ring. Is this guy fucking stupid or what?
tatikios | -6 points
Can somebody please explain to me how "sex trafficking" and "pimping out minors" for sex is NOT a pedophilia ring?
The one is prostitution but with minors.
The other is an organized group which meets to rape & kill children in pizza restaurants. At least according to this subreddit.
The_Watterboy | 8 points
You don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about. Go to bed
C3PHO3 | 1 points
That's best case scenario. Worst case, this shill is actively covering up and dispelling a giant pedo ring from the masses. Nice!
DontVanMeBro | 9 points
So, I think you could support your claim better with maybe a screen shot because quotes aren't credible - George Washington
Monica was researching sex trafficking which is when a person pimps out a minor for prostitution, and it has nothing to do with Clinton or pedophile rings . These people have posted this crap all over redditt which is totally disrespecting the family
How is it disrespectful to the family? Their Daughter was doing a noble deed investigating trafficking and now that will be well known. Also, How are they so sure it has nothing to do with the Clintons?
tatikios | -3 points
How is it disrespectful to the family?
Because the whole story is a lie?
If one of your relatives killed themselves, would you like it if some crazy person spread a story that she was murdered by Clinton?
Gummalillan | 3 points
Shill confirmed.
tatikios | 1 points
How?
If you don't believe me, ask Bella herself.
Gummalillan | 8 points
Your posting history is very interesting. Old account that has not been used in four years, revived only 5 days ago with the sole purpose of lying about Monica's death and discrediting what has been uncovered about the criminal Clinton Foundation and its ties to child trafficking. Classic CTR operation.
Just give it up. You have ZERO credibility.
tatikios | -2 points
I hope you will make the same comment about /u/rutkdn.
Will you?
Gummalillan | 6 points
Nah, not wasting more time on you since you are a confirmed cubicle worker for David Brock, former lover of good ol' pedo James Alefantis and very closely connected to the repulsive circle of criminals and pedophile perverts surrounding Hillary Clinton.
Blocking you now, pedo protector. Ta ta.
SkadamooshSkadamoosh | 1 points
Thank you for correcting the record.
BTW what made you think suicide has to do with this? She was murdered.
J_O_N_Y_ | 6 points
but that guy had screenshot of Bella's Fb posts...
sunkenberries | 7 points
This. We've seen the links with the comments, so she's contradicting herself at this point. If this is true she's been compromised.
tatikios | -3 points
Did he?
He had a screenshot without name or date. Could have been anyone, anytime.
Bella is on facebook, go ask her herself if you don't believe me.
GoHeadBeGoneWithIt | 6 points
LMFAO THIS IS FAKE AS SHIT. MODS TAKE THIS DOWN.
tatikios | 0 points
http://imgur.com/a/b3wlX
Screenshot.
Why don't you ask her yourself and post your result?
GodSaveRCountry | 5 points
Reminds me of this:
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is a quotation from the c. 1600 play Hamlet by William Shakespeare.
I think someone mentioned this a few days ago in relation to Sandy Hook.
I would think that someone like Bella would know human trafficking and pedophilia go hand in hand. I think if Monica Peterson was definitely in Haiti and died it IS tied to Clintons or human trafficking or something terrible and should be investigated.
tatikios | 0 points
I think
Why do you think so?
Edit: if you cannot counter the argument, attack the other's motivation.
Classic ad hominem.
PizzaThrowaway777777 | 2 points
I swear I've seen a (Facebook?) tirade by Monica Petersen that blasts the Clinton Foundation's involvement in Haiti. It also calls into question mineral rights granted to Hillary's brother. Anyone have this? Because it would directly refute the OP's claim that Monica wasn't at least very skeptical of the Clinton Foundation. Edit: Was it a public post? Edit2: It's still on 8chan /pol/
rutkdn | 2 points
Wow. I have now been contacted by 3 different people privately trying to convince me that there is no link to the foundation. This is really bad. Something is going on.
I repeat, Monica was clearly investigating Clinton.
Back in January 4th Bella shared Monica's findings: https://i.sli.mg/PsLtmj.png
The day before, on January 3rd, she re-shared a post originally made by Monica with a link to a blog post critical of Hillary Clinton (second item here: http://i.imgur.com/TmiB2gU.png). "Ms. Clinton has corrupt & dirty business to finish in Haiti ... This is the theory my masters thesis puts forth" ----< how do you not see what Monica was up to? Are you blind?
Also FYI, the family has NOT RECEIVED MONICA'S BODY. I repeat, they did not bury her and an autopsy was not done in the US. They are trusting misinformation coming out of Haiti.
If anything, Bella must be very scared at this point. I tend to agree with that gut feeling.
tatikios | 1 points
Please quote where I "claim that Monica wasn't at least very skeptical of the Clinton Foundation".
I never claimed that so please do not make up stuff that is not true.
In another post I specifically stated that yes, Monica was critical of Clinton. She wrote a whole article about Haiti and criticized Clinton's politics.
However, she never linked Clinton to child trafficking.
See the difference?
PizzaThrowaway777777 | 2 points
There is no need to be so defensive. My post isn't directed at you, since I highly doubt you'd be the one providing what I am seeking. I want to see the screen capture that was circulated last week not argue with someone who is grieving. Whoever-- you, or the person quoted--outright says this has nothing to do with the Clintons perhaps hasn't considered the totality of circumstances.
tatikios | 1 points
Are you serious? You directly attacked my credibility and claimed I made statemets that I never made.
PizzaThrowaway777777 | 2 points
The title of your post says no Clinton involvement. I don't think that connection can be overlooked outright. Somehow you think that it's impossible for the "pimp-pimped" dynamic to exist in an organized, even international apparatus such as with the CF? Very hard to follow.
If I've misunderstood it's because you've miscommunicated or have been intentionally vague/misleading.
Commonwombat | 2 points
Yes she did, she thought trafficking was happening through the Caracol Complex.
rutkdn | 2 points
YES SHE DID. You are spreading misinformation.
Back in January 4th Bella shared Monica's findings. See the last few paragraphs: https://i.sli.mg/PsLtmj.png
Commonwombat | 1 points
http://www.tmn.today/2016/11/woman-investigating-clinton-foundation-child-trafficking/
msgtw123 | 1 points
And why exactly doesn't she make this statement public, instead of sending you out here, with no credibility, to speak on her behalf?
tatikios | 1 points
Why don't you ask her? I'm not her spokesperson. Just someone who did his own research instead of blindly believing some weirdo.
DigForTheKids | 1 points
This is just like Seth Rich's parents in denial about why their son was killed. We know from wikileaks that Laura Silsby has a close relationship with the Clinton syndicate. It isn't a stretch by any means to say that someone who is researching human trafficking in Haiti is ultimately investigating the Clinton's operations there. Besides, how do her parents know what she was on to or what she was killed for? I think often in grief, including after what is perceived as a suicide, loved ones can become so emotional that they are unable to critically consider the full possibilities of the circumstances of a death. I.E. they think this was a run of the mill suicide.
HulaguKan | 1 points
Besides, how do her parents know what she was on to or what she was killed for?
How does the guy who made the first thread about it know?
Why believe him when none of her friends and relatives support his claims?
He literally has no evidence at all for his claim. Monica never in any of her writings or statements connected the Clintons to child trafficking. His claim that her friends and family supported his claims turned out to be nothing but fabrications.
So why believe him? Just because something is theoretically possible does not mean it is a fact.
tobyccna | 1 points
http://i.imgur.com/TmiB2gU.jpg
The one is prostitution but with minors.
The other is an organized group which meets to rape & kill children > in pizza restaurants. At least according to this subreddit.
I'm down in Haiti for the next 3 wks doing fieldwork on human trafficking (i.e. ALL exploited labor sectors, not just sex)
Then there is the statement from Bella.. If she didn't want people to mix the Clinton foundation in her death, why the fuck is she calling them out in her post about her death?
My main language is not english, so please someone tell me if i'm retarded and understanding this incorrectly or if OP is a CTR cumswapper that made a fake fb account and messaged himself.
Commonwombat | 1 points
http://www.tmn.today/2016/11/woman-investigating-clinton-foundation-child-trafficking/
rutkdn | 1 points
You are spreading misinformation.
https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5dbdz9/i_found_a_smoking_gun_monica_petersen_found_dead/
TigerFan_in_BR | 21 points | Nov 22 2016 13:25:52
Monica was investigating trafficking of children from Haiti.
She was investigating the Clinton Foundation AND DIDN'T KNOW IT.
That's the problem.
The family will want the truth - however terrible it is - to be revealed.
permalink
tatikios | 0 points | Nov 22 2016 13:39:40
Did you actually read what I posted?
permalink
sunkenberries | 8 points | Nov 22 2016 13:41:49
Firstly, if you want the slightest bit of credibility you should at least post a screenshot.
Secondly, the reason we heard about this case in the first place was because Bella made the FB comments herself.
I assume you haven't seen the uploaded video by the Center of Human Trafficking, where her boss made a statement about her either...
permalink
tatikios | -2 points | Nov 22 2016 13:44:18
Proof?
Screenshot of her statement to me
permalink
[deleted] | 4 points | Nov 22 2016 13:46:09
[deleted]
permalink
tatikios | -1 points | Nov 22 2016 13:49:48
I've seen it. There is no proof that it was posted by Bella, written by Monica and it did not claim that Clinton were involved in child trafficking.
That's why I ask for proof.
permalink
DontVanMeBro | 2 points | Nov 22 2016 13:44:57
yours first.
permalink
tatikios | 0 points | Nov 22 2016 13:45:34
http://imgur.com/a/b3wlX
permalink
DontVanMeBro | 3 points | Nov 22 2016 14:01:03
Ehhh...http://imgur.com/a/MgWsH seems like you have very poor logic due to the fact you don't include in the post from your history a fact that your trusted source told you she was investigating
permalink
tatikios | -2 points | Nov 22 2016 14:02:46
I honestly do not understand what you are trying to day.
permalink
rutkdn | 3 points | Nov 22 2016 18:33:45
I have now been contacted by 3 different people privately trying to convince me that there is no link to the foundation. This is really bad. Something is going on.
Monica was clearly investigating Clinton.
Bella can say what she wants now (if she did indeed say to you what you claim). It DOES NOT change the facts she posted 11 months ago.
Back in January 4th Bella shared Monica's findings: https://i.sli.mg/PsLtmj.png
The day before, on January 3rd, she re-shared a post originally made by Monica with a link to a blog post critical of Hillary Clinton (second item here: http://i.imgur.com/TmiB2gU.png). "Ms. Clinton has corrupt & dirty business to finish in Haiti ... This is the theory my masters thesis puts forth" ----< how do you not see what Monica was up to? Are you blind?
Also FYI, the family has NOT RECEIVED MONICA'S BODY. I repeat, they did not bury her and an autopsy was not done in the US. They are trusting misinformation coming out of Haiti.
If anything, Bella must be very scared at this point. I tend to agree with that gut feeling.
permalink