AgencyFB | 40 points | Nov 22 2016 03:19:56

Heads up, we're hitting Snopes now.

http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/

permalink

heihuquan | 23 points | Nov 22 2016 03:30:43

Two fat fucks and a cat is what composes Snopes's research team, remember that. Also, I just debunked Snopes for being a government mouthpiece for disinformation. If people stop talking about them and referring to them in any way, they'll disappear as fast as their allegedly credibility.

permalink

sunkenberries | 9 points | Nov 22 2016 03:55:54

Snopes uses "factcheck.org" as their source of reference. Factcheck.org is largely influenced by the government organisation "Stratfor". I wouldn't trust Snopes. (Go to Wikileaks.org, type in "stratfor" "factcheck") You'll see over 60 pages of emails discussing the use of Factcheck ("factcheck the shit out of this", etc.) (try to go to the earliest pages.)

permalink

Queen-Mab | 5 points | Nov 22 2016 03:34:15

Eh, I just tried to share this with a close friend and was rebutted with "Snopes is still investigating it, but it sounds like a stretch"

Ugh.

permalink

_papi_chulo | 2 points | Nov 22 2016 03:36:34

two fat fucks and a cat

You just described us too

permalink

Queen-Mab | 11 points | Nov 22 2016 03:40:27

No, this sub is more like two fat autistic fucks and a cat on cocaine. Much more efficient

permalink

heihuquan | 5 points | Nov 22 2016 03:42:03

Yeah, I could have probably used better terms for them but I'm well sick of those arrogant, condescending, disinfo cunts. I'll re-phrase, how does '2 Buffet Aficionados and a feline' work for you?

permalink

19-80-4 | 4 points | Nov 22 2016 03:45:41

These numpties just think with whatever their key idea sites tell them to think.

They're going to run to fact check next? Or CNN? All that clearly demonstrated bias to Clinton during the election instead of remaining objective?

You can't beat the insular environment they operate in. These nutjobs genuinely believe that RUSSIA helped Wikileaks and Trump because that's what the idea progenitor of their echo chamber says. They also believe trump is the next Hitler because of the FUD stirred up by biased media interests with conflicts of interest.

I'm not saying the "alt right" is infallible in its reasoning, as there's plenty of propaganda on that end, too.

To make light of child exploitation shows you the general moral relativism of the left. They care more about their narcissistic sphere of consumption than they do about suffering of other people. Don't fuck with their pizza joints, man. That's where they go to pick up girls, HUHHUHUH.

Fucking pathetic degenerates.

permalink

TheRickest_Rick | 16 points | Nov 22 2016 03:30:40

My favorite part:

"Now, there is obviously some weird stuff in there, but I really think these people are starting to go crazy!! One of the supposedly inappropriate pictures they pull from James Alefantis' instagram is of a smiling girl with her hands taped down to a table. Yeah that's weird but, can that not just be a really innocent game? Like just picking on a little kid?"

Who the fuck writes this shit?

permalink

19-80-4 | 8 points | Nov 22 2016 03:48:19

Your typical moral relativist.

"Can't it be this?" Bitch YOU'RE just making stuff up now.

permalink

GordoSSGranudo | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 05:02:20

smiling

permalink

knajjd11 | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 16:58:46

Putting text that says "hotard - someone who is both a whore and a retard" on a picture they took of an infant is really innocent too, isn't it? Goodness.

permalink

stereoblind | 16 points | Nov 22 2016 03:32:56

Keep in mind that Snopes basically works for the U.S. government. If they don't already they might as well be collecting paychecks from them. Don't believe anything on this site ever under any circumstance and I promise you they are going to label pizzagate as false so everyone on r/politics can spread it around and call everyone "alt-right conspiritards".

permalink

giantbollocks | 8 points | Nov 22 2016 03:26:33

RESEARCH IN PROGRESS

you think pedophilia was enough for snopes to quit shilling for a bit?

permalink

Warning-Derailment | 6 points | Nov 22 2016 03:38:36

We actually have a name we can send information to, so fire away with the strongest evidence.

permalink

whatsausername90 | 2 points | Nov 22 2016 07:48:25

They need to include the instagram photos directly. Only way to be objective. Let people decide for themselves just how suspicious they are.

permalink

pizzathrowaway777 | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 07:50:58

Someone should buy snopesisbullshit.com and make a website dedicated to debunking snopes.

permalink