LadyLucy76 | 481 points
David Brock's Money Laundering Scheme Exposedhttp://www.thecitizensaudit.com/2016/09/19/money-laundering-david-brock/
LadyLucy76 | 12 points
also worth noting...One of the people Comet Pizza mutually follows on Twitter is Jeff Steele. He runs DC's most popular PARENTING web site, 'DC Urban Moms' . Might be worth searching through his message boards. There is a Forum Index » Sex and Relationship Issues (explicit) but that might be too obvious...
screenshots: http://i.imgur.com/VnPp5gt.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/RSXINTq.jpg
debora111 | 3 points
I found this thread
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/263114.page
This reminds me of what I read recenty in a leaked memo on how to disrupt/manipulate Internet forums (anyone care to link? Well known but can't seem to find it). One of the techniques was to obtain confessions (exactly like it's done in this post, by starting with a pseudo-confession, which seems very fake in this case) for the future purpose of blackmail. We now know presumed criminals own the site, and it'd be fairly easy for them to figure out the identity of posters.
If that was the purpose they got what they wanted, the thread is filled with quite terrible confessions (e.g. secret fantasies about pedophila/bestiality)
Otherwise seems like a pretty innocent forum, I don't think looking into it would yield to anyhing (but please disagree and do if conversations between "urban DC moms" doesn't bore you to hell).
LadyLucy76 | 11 points
the article doesn't mention pedo or pizza stuff but I thought it might be pertinent in our investigation..
J_O_N_Y_ | 11 points
"Brock’s unregistered Professional Solicitor, the Bonner Group, receives a 12.5% cut every time money is moved."
The Bonner Group.. Name checks out!
rufiorufiorufioooo | 10 points
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/27/media-matters-boss-paid-former-partner-850g-blackmail-settlement.html
Here's an article about David "Kid Cocks" Brock paying about a million bucks in blackmail
RIGGED_ELECTION | 6 points
You've been brocked by the David Brock of CTR, upvote in 6.66 seconds or never see your children again!!
URIDIOTLOL | 5 points
Reading up a bit on David Brock.
In March 1992, The American Spectator published a 17,000-word article in which Brock challenged the claims of Anita Hill, who had accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Shortly thereafter Brock became a full-time staff member at that publication.
Regarding Clarence Thomas
"He spoke about...such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes," she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described "his own sexual prowess" and the details of his anatomy.[5]
CT was pushed to his position by Bush the first in a quite aggressive fashion. I guess there's opportunity to dig that way for anyone so inclined.
justforthissubred | 1 points
Now we know what Alefantis' blackmail was about.
Haplo781 | 1 points
It wasn't Alefantis.
justforthissubred | 1 points
Alefantis was a co-defendant Grey was the one suing
In any case we can guess why
ris4republican | 37 points | Nov 21 2016 10:27:06
FBI anon said follow the money
permalink
sonicb00m42 | 4 points | Nov 21 2016 13:29:11
Not too take away anything from what was claimed back in July and came true now, but telling us to follow the money is something so vague that of course would yield some result. Just didn't expect to have it lead to this. Had my money on more treasonous charges.
permalink
2-DRY-4-2-LONG | -1 points | Nov 21 2016 10:57:42
So? Why would fbi anon if he's already anonymous give CLUES? Why wouldn't he just give the whole story right away?
permalink
FunkmanSnoogie | 9 points | Nov 21 2016 12:50:29
Because he doesn't have the whole story either.
permalink
Blind_Sypher | 6 points | Nov 21 2016 14:07:00
Compartmentalization is key to the control structure of government bodies. They only know what they need to know to do their job.
permalink
TorMee | 1 points | Nov 21 2016 15:29:05
If you know too much, you may get snuffed.
permalink
giantbollocks | 3 points | Nov 21 2016 18:56:29
Not to mention, if he exposed all he knows, it might expose him. If only a small group of individuals has a piece of info...
permalink
horridCAM666 | 2 points | Nov 21 2016 22:49:08
Exactly.
permalink
EarthquakesVolcanoes | 3 points | Nov 21 2016 13:18:02
Transparency is the most important part in all of this. The only way to expose this crime ring that is our government is to do so through the people. FBI, NSA, social media, etc is all compromised. If the people themselves crack this thing wide open, what can TPTB say? What recourse will that have before we give them the death penalty?
permalink
ris4republican | 1 points | Nov 21 2016 20:27:28
Give a Man a Fish, and You Feed Him for a Day. Teach a Man To Fish, and You Feed Him for a Lifetime
permalink
2-DRY-4-2-LONG | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 07:39:04
yes
permalink
Haplo781 | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 03:26:00
Because it would expose her identity.
permalink
2-DRY-4-2-LONG | 1 points | Nov 22 2016 07:38:40
no it wouldn't?
permalink
Haplo781 | 0 points | Nov 22 2016 14:53:56
Yuh-huh.
permalink