Why am i just seeing this sub?

sunkenberries | 25 points | Nov 21 2016 04:30:50

Because Twitter has blocked the hashtag, all media outlets suppressing it, and trying to bury it with some other "pizzagate" thing about soccer.

UnpopularPavilion | 15 points | Nov 21 2016 04:39:38

They're masquerading it as 'alt right censorship' meanwhile half of us here are liberals

PeppeLePoint | 10 points | Nov 21 2016 06:18:58

The right and left SHOULD be working together on this. Its the common person vs. the power hungry elites. As we now see, they will do anything to maintain power.

KFCNyanCat | 4 points | Nov 21 2016 04:36:37

On Tumblr, it's being buried by something about Big Brother (British TV show.) This one seems organic, but still worth looking into.

nottheoretical | 15 points | Nov 21 2016 04:36:22

Welcome to how reality really is. Media does not cover news. Media is bought by the same breed of rats that run this show we're talking about here.

ancient_astronaut | 7 points | Nov 21 2016 07:01:23

The revolution will not be televised.

LuminaryAziraphale | 2 points | Nov 21 2016 05:56:14

At this point i feel like this is why society was made. To support this cult presence. And perhaps they just decided it would be easier to do if they could keep more people in a single area. The whole pedo thing has been a part of governments since they have been around. In some cases it was the societal norm (western roman empire). Moloch has been around as long as there has been written word.

RealRickSanchez | 2 points | Nov 21 2016 06:11:23

No, thats bot why society was made. But the peoppe in power are so far out of touch with whats normal. Its possible to have all these secrets if theres an orginization dedicated to it. Just like cancer.

ancient_astronaut | 2 points | Nov 21 2016 06:58:49

Because its the 1% vs the 99% and that one 1% are the gatekeepers to all the media we watch. No "conspiracy" there. Look how consolidated media is.

think_whatif | -5 points | Nov 21 2016 04:45:55

Because there is no proof, all speculation. Risk of libel and slander is heavy at this point.

Nightmare_Files | 11 points | Nov 21 2016 04:57:57

Is it libel and slander to repost what the pedophiles posted themselves?

a-SynKronus | 10 points | Nov 21 2016 04:52:46

I think I may die from laughing at this point. Media has never cared about proof unless it hurts their image. Look at who owns the media corp and you will see ;)

rockthe40__oz | 9 points | Nov 21 2016 05:03:52

There's been plenty of proof

ForeverImmature | -4 points | Nov 21 2016 05:50:32

What we have is thin circumstantial evidence that can easily be explained away.

The renders of Madeleine McCann's abductor (and Martin and Mary Smith, who described them, only saw one person )? Coincidence. Lots of people look like that. The mole is just noise and it's on the wrong side.

The Instagram photos? A little suspicious, yes, given that Mr. Alefantis has no children, but they don't prove anything. Perhaps he just likes babies but can't have one of his own.

The logos? Innocent mistake, because not everybody bothers to read an FBI report about pedophilia symbols. And stretching the ping pong paddles to look like a butterfly is just sad.

Besta Pizza's logo change in response? They heard the rumours about them, understood that it might be a little creepy to have such a logo, and changed it.

The occult art? Marina Abramovic is a little weird in general. The Jeffrey Dahmer thing is just coincidence.

Already this subreddit has embarrassed itself enough in searching for evidence. Remember the Italian conversations and z-sec, and now we're jumping all over these trolls who are teasing us?