Can you guys show me the evidence that the podestas were involved in some kind of satanic ritual? The only things I can find are links from snopes and Washington Post claiming those things are false

sunkenberries | 8 points | Nov 20 2016 08:00:01

I used to believe in Snopes but I found out they are no different from media, look into the background of who funds snopes and you'll find out...

DepressedExplorer | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 08:21:59

http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp CTRL+F "funds"

Edit:// In other words, sauce please

sunkenberries | 6 points | Nov 20 2016 08:27:47

Yeah, Snopes makes its own evidence....

Honestly I first questioned Snopes' legitimacy when it started making yes/no conclusions under incomplete evidence, regarding everything related to the Clinton Foundation/Democrats/History/etc.

I used to love Snopes btw. Used it to confirm everything as a high school kid, like that crazy frog-looking guy's meme and stuff.

DepressedExplorer | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 08:34:17

I dont really read snopes, nether do i really care. I was just wondering where you got that about the funding from. Which you still dont answered.

HamstersAreReal | 4 points | Nov 20 2016 07:21:57

I understand the_donald is a controversial sub, but they provided a good layout of information for the initial spirit cooking that helped kick-start the whole investigation: here's the link.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5b08cy/warning_graphic_i_dont_think_you_guys_appreciate/

bassistb0y | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 07:27:02

From what I looked up marina abromovic is a performer. Playing devil's advocate, who's to say this isn't just her inviting him to an act of a performance and maybe teaching him about it?

HamstersAreReal | 7 points | Nov 20 2016 07:28:50

That same post answers it, read her AMA she did 3 years ago in which she explains that public vs private performances are very different. Remember the invite was to her own private residence.

afterbernerthrowaway | 4 points | Nov 20 2016 08:57:29

From her 8/19/2013 Reddit AMA: http://i.imgur.com/fCqrFal.png

The spirit cooking dinner to which Marina invited the Podesta brothers (evidenced in the Podesta Wikileaks, https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15893) was at her private home.

msgtw123 | 3 points | Nov 20 2016 07:33:43

When you did your research, did it also show you that her twitter handle had 666 in it, that she cut pentagrams into herself, and used satanic imagery? Did you look up what "spirit cooking" is?

DepressedExplorer | -2 points | Nov 20 2016 08:19:04

My telephone number has 666 in it. Am i possesed? O_O

msgtw123 | 1 points | Nov 21 2016 06:32:18

Did you choose it?

DepressedExplorer | 1 points | Nov 21 2016 06:58:28

msgtw123 | 1 points | Nov 21 2016 06:34:50

Not possessed, just and asshole.

HamstersAreReal | 3 points | Nov 20 2016 07:41:12

She has a very strange obsession with pentagrams (which are typically associated with satan), her twitter handle literally has 666 at the end, she has some extremely creepy pictures taken with children such as:

this:https://i.sli.mg/9zF2ZE.jpg

And this: https://i.sli.mg/3eoKMj.jpg

Btw, watch her spirit cooking video, that's not normal art, whatsoever.

DepressedExplorer | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 08:20:28

normal art

reddit these days

blieveit | 2 points | Nov 20 2016 15:34:57

devil is in the details. She is a performer. She is a satanist. Spirit cooking is a direct reference to Aleister Crowley's Book of Thelma. Sure a catholic could be engaging in a mock satanic ritual for fun (though that seems unlikely) but Marina has specified that private performances are "real" unlike her public ones.

I am really surprised that the art doesn't speak for itself. There is satanic reference in almost every single one. It would be like an artist that includes references to jesus, mary, and puts a cross and a lamb in every painting but peolpe insist it is just art, not related to or referencing Christianity at all. Worse it is like some of Tony Podesta's favorite artists, depicting children suggestively/nude, saying their art is to showcase sexuality of children, then insisting it isn't child porn or related to or referencing child porn at all.

I am an artist. I believe in freedom of expression. Besides the kid stuff all the satanic art is their prerogative. But let's not use art for the all inclusive cover- call a spade a spade.

Sister_Lauren | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 16:27:44

Some account, don't remember which one, was scrubbed to remove a reference to her being Jewish when she hit the news for her 'art' work. I remember seeing it being reported.

blieveit | 1 points | Nov 20 2016 16:48:18

yeah me too. she now is careful to list herself as serbian. A correction of ethnicity, not religion?

DepressedExplorer | 0 points | Nov 20 2016 08:19:52

Shh. Dont tell them that i told you, but you are very likely right.

Ether people are just crazy or this satanism and canibalism bullshit is only posted to discredit the whole research and make sure no media outlet would every pick it up.