SlimtheMidgetKiller | 993 points
Anybody noticed if you search for pizzagate on google or Facebook you find different pizza related articles all with the hashtag pizzagate. One such was a story about the owner of papa Johns eating at a different pizza place. The MSM is actively trying to bury this story
colucci | 50 points
Looking too much into it. The original usage of pizzagate was when a soccer player threw a slice of pizza at the opponent team's manager. It's not a cover up per se, people have been using 'pizzagate' to refer to other things for years prior to this.
RecklessRatRedditor | 19 points
I think this is three things hapoening at once.
1) Pizza companies trying to captialize rather than suffer from such a strong negative association.
2) Total collusion by the media to cover this story up since they are to many degrees implicated in the coverup.
3) Absolute proof that the beast is wounded and that we now have awareness of their weakness as well as our power. The children will unite us and untie their lascivious, pedocratic tyranny for many ages to come and God willing, forever.
eisenschiml | 21 points
Or 4) there is tons of online content left over from multiple other "pizzagate" events in the past and there actually aren't that many people delusional enough to care about this particular pizzagate for it to have much content or traction throughout the greater internet.
Disquestrian | 8 points
Pizzagate was a quick internal name that just bubbled up in the first days this was coming together when they're were only a few people on a couple of posts and no one had time to think about where it would all go
The name stuck but that doesn't mean it can't be changed. .. or added to. Pick something, tell everyone and pass the word.
Pedopizzagate
Pizzapedogate
Something that distinguishes it and includes the term the speaks to the seriousness of what this is about.
Maybe something even more pointed.
Pedophiliagate
Or maybe it makes sense to be nimble like the nimblest pedes always are and don't keep the same name. Change it every week or two and they won't be able to drown it out. By the time they try to drown one name we are already using another.
libertyant | 4 points
guys use "littlelivesmatter" & "bringdownthering" AS WELL. Prominent Twitter users are using these tags now. We must help them trend.
Sister_Lauren | 3 points
littlelivesmatter would seem the best to me. After all, isn't that what this is really all about?
[deleted] | 7 points
[deleted]
DragonKnight196 | 7 points
This was the original "pizzagate" from a while back. Not related to this pizzagate, but earlier.
[deleted] | 4 points
[deleted]
theghostmachine | 4 points
Because people are digging it up again by googling the word. A lot of people who search probably end up checking that article too, just out of curiosity.
Penisgang | 5 points
Yeah, this happened and wasn't termed pizza gate until like 2007-8, despite happening in 2004. It became pizzagate after someone released an autobiography and it was confirmed that Cesc Fabregas had been the one who threw food at SAF and it was none other than a pizza.
theghostmachine | 2 points
Ever consider the possibilty that this isn't the first time the word "pizzagate" has been used to label something?
faithle55 | 7 points
Why do you think that?
What is the motive of 'the MSM'? Do you seriously suppose there are no journalists - print, TV, radio, online - who wouldn't charge into the possibility of an actual paedophile conspiracy centering on Washington figures? Not a single journalist who wouldn't see this as an outstanding opportunity to further his or her career - even if it meant leaving their employer and taking the story to another employer, or just breaking it on the internet and waiting for the job offers to roll in?
That there are no media owners who would give their eye-teeth to fuck up the Democratic party by revealing atrociously criminal behaviour by senior members of the party?
Don't you ever have a moment where you think: 'Actually, this is all outlandishly improbable, I ought to be looking for crisp, unambiguous, coherent evidence and not what-ifs and maybes and posters claiming to be FBI agents who could equally well be literally any other thing ...'
SlimtheMidgetKiller | 6 points
Go ahead and tell me that long list of media owner....go ahead. Once you discover that all MSM is owned by less than 5 people that all know and communicate with each other. There are no real investigative journalists anymore or none with a big enough pedestal from which to shout
faithle55 | 4 points
MSM is owned by less than 5 people
You're an idiot, and you're the worst kind of idiot, an uninformed one.
Who owns CBS? Quick now, which of your 5 people is it?
Which TV broadcaster with a news division is owned by Cumulus Media plc? Which of your 5 people owns Cumulus? Come on, get a move on - what's the answer? The certainty in your post is inconsistent with not having these things at your fingertips....
OK, here's another - Comcast. Which broadcast news company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Comcast? And which of your 5 guys owns Comcast? Surely you know this one...?
No???
Have I successfully demonstrated that you haven't got a fucking clue what you're talking about?
I have.
Elmo_Tully | 4 points
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6?IR=T
faithle55 | 5 points
Congratulations player 2! You have successfully linked to another website from reddit, earning a Bob Peck Clever Girl badge.
What's your point?
SlimtheMidgetKiller | 1 points
6 corporations that control 90% of mainstream media are CBS, Viacom, Disney, news corp, Comcast and AOL/timewarner. So go ahead and tell me again how im wrong. Idiot
faithle55 | 1 points
Well, now you're right.
But since what you said in this post is COMPLETELY FUCKING DIFFERENT from what you said in the earlier post, who are you calling an idiot, dumbkopf?
Sister_Lauren | 2 points
The ONLY journalist who I can think of who would touch it is Lee Camp with "Redacted Tonight" from RT and he is actually a comedian. There might be two or three others.
faithle55 | 1 points
You're mistaken.
At least, you're mistaken if we postulate that there was a real story here to investigate. If there was, journalists would be queuing up. If you could write or broadcast a story on the pizzagate elements, that's Pulitzer right there.
The reason why they don't touch it is not because it's dangerous, it's because journalists know how to sniff a story and weigh evidence. And that process tells them that pizzagate is as real as Frankenstein's monster, and twice as dead.
indeegirl42 | 3 points
Shouldn't it be an admission of guilt?! This is insane!!
SlimtheMidgetKiller | 3 points
That's how I see it. The fact that so many non related stories are being called pizzagate by MSM definitely stinks of a cover up attempt
Codexnecro | 2 points
Not really, quite the contrary. At least with me shows a lot of stuff related to #pizzagate.
libertyant | 2 points
this guy is raising hell about it:
https://twitter.com/d_seaman
suggest we also use "littlelivesmatter" and "bringdownthering" hashtags too
yoshootme | 3 points
this guy , david seaman, was kicked off huffpo as a writer because he was delving into hillary's health prior to the election. he has been a guest on almost every major news show. has gone out on a limb before with stories about bitcoin and others. proves he is willing to do the same on this.
libertyant | 2 points
good to hear. shame he used to be HuffPo but this is a story than one doesnt joke about and hes going all out.
Aspernari | 2 points
Or perhaps adding "gate" to something is a dumb thing to do if you want it to be easily found, since adding "gate" is a dumb thing people do all over for stupid reasons?
StratusTrot | 2 points
Either that or you find articles warning you of 'fake news'. Also, if you start to type 'pizzagate' into Google News, no suggestions come up.
libertyant | 1 points
also try searching from diff browsers , using tor, using incognito or w/e and using diff search enginges. google could be hiding things from us using its algo.
jennayyy_26 | 67 points | Nov 19 2016 23:59:27
When I search, almost every link that comes up is related to this actual scandal. However, the ones from major websites talk about it as "the latest conspiracy theory." At least it's being talked about, I suppose.
permalink
libertyant | 12 points | Nov 20 2016 10:15:57
guys use "littlelivesmatter" & "bringdownthering" AS WELL. Prominent Twitter users are using these tags now. We must help them trend.
permalink
thunderstruck316 | 10 points | Nov 20 2016 01:23:36
Not for me when I search google but by cluttering it up with other useless shit like that they are trying to make it seem less of an issue and make it die down
permalink
ned_harriman | 7 points | Nov 20 2016 08:58:16
Stop using google and start using something like duckduckgo
You'll thank me later :)
permalink
thunderstruck316 | 4 points | Nov 20 2016 08:59:58
that doesnt help with anything all the normies are using google. They will see it mixed in a bunch of pointless shit and have to look for it instead of realising how big it is and just dismiss it off as tinfoil hat craziness. They are trying to stop this from growing
permalink