AluminumDeodorant | 62 points
To go forward, you must go back
The Belgian pedo-ring and Epstein's mess aren't unresearchable, but anything published within the past few years will have been cleaned. You have to look at who the socialized with and donated to BEFORE they were popped. That is much harder to cover up.
But I wouldn't just say something like that without bringing something to the party. How about a party held by Jeffrey Epstein's procurer, before they were popped, where many socialites took issue because they weren't invited.
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-455902/Ghislaine-Maxwell-just-like-Daddy.html
This sub thinks that Rachael Chandler was Epstein's hookup, but remember that it was mentioned that she attended Chelsea Clinton's Wedding?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/12/247D039E00000578-2906981-image-m-6_1421094415352.jpg
And for a fist-full of sketch
http://www.tatler.com/bystander/events/2000/june/christies-young-collectors-party#!/17205/image/3
Once the sacrificial lamb gets popped, they would lay low, but the ring wouldn't just start over. It would eventually come back together. Follow the close relationships, watch them get bigger and smaller, and that will lead you to the center as is stands today.
AluminumDeodorant | 2 points
http://www.behindthepinecurtain.com/wordpress/organized-pedophilia-and-the-criminal-exploitation-of-children/
jsalow14 | 2 points
You know who used to hang with Epstein?
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5556/7-things-you-need-know-about-trump-and-sex-slave-amanda-prestigiacomo#
AluminumDeodorant | 2 points | Nov 19 2016 12:16:34
The top one has so much data and it all looks really good. I think TG has been brought up before, but have we scoured his research. Maybe stuff that seemed insignificant in the past is not very important.
http://tedgunderson.info/index%20-%20copy%20-%20copy%20-%20copy.htm
http://yattt.blogspot.com/2008/01/michael-painter-and-james-howell-video.html
permalink