PraiseBeKEK | 32 points | Nov 17 2016 09:35:57

Found Something Huge!!!

Reversed google image searched one of the files that test positive for steg and found an interesting flickr. Also, look at the girl top right corner of one of the pictures! https://www.flickr.com/photos/34519825@N04/favorites/

Images Collected: http://imgur.com/a/NMunZ

The image that I reverse image searched was the two birds, which was in podesta's emails. Everyone please try to get as much information before they make everything private!

Out of images that I downloaded from flickr 3(including the one with the girl) are positive for steg. These are the images that were true for steg and a few other pictures. http://imgur.com/a/AK9GE I used stegexpose to identify them.

permalink

CatacystFPV | 7 points | Nov 17 2016 12:05:13

First off, it's worse than Alefantis, it's literally Robert Infantes. She did look familiar though, but now I'm not so sure: http://archive.is/x3HDB

Any thoughts?

permalink

CatacystFPV | 5 points | Nov 17 2016 12:14:42

I'm unable to make out Madeleine's birthmark in the girl's right eye, and I'm also unable to mess with the image at the moment. Kinda gets my heart going a little bit though. Definitely a strange corner of the Internet over there.

permalink

SarahAssange | 3 points | Nov 17 2016 13:44:34

I'm pretty sure it's not the same nose Maddie's nose is shaped like a rectangular box . Focus on extracting the hidden pictures instead "Infante " cant be just a coincidence

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 23:24:29

Robert Infantes

Sorry who is Robert Infantes? The person using that name has made a lot of fake twitter accounts.

permalink

Motorcycle-cop | 6 points | Nov 17 2016 09:56:42

http://archive.is/TTGEi

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 5 points | Nov 17 2016 10:12:36

Can anyone tell me if that girl has been in any comet ping pong pictures?

permalink

YouFellAsleep-WakeUp | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 11:51:19

Hard to say, but it does look very similar to the girl taped to the table in that whole mess of Comet images.

permalink

thispizzaiswhack | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 10:58:11

whats wrong with the name?

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 11:10:43

nvm thought it was similar to James Alefantis.

permalink

DepressedExplorer | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 11:27:24

Wait. Is that image related or did you just pick a random image that google reverse suggested because there is a child in it?

Also not sure how you test for steg, but these are png files with actual fotos. Most of them will be currupted in a way that stegenographie seems possible, while it really has not to be at all.

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 11:29:05

I picked the image from podesta's email that was positive for steg! The group on flickr had that same image and others that tested positive for steg. I used StegExpose, and wouldn't it be odd for three to be positive? Whats best image upload site?

permalink

DepressedExplorer | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 11:32:48

Dont know, imgur maybe :)

I still dont get it, which image was in the podesta email? Only the one with the girl? Or the complete montage?

Also can you please tell me how you test for steg? I see so many claims of people finding steg, but as someone who has written steg tools i highly doubt anyone could simply detect these.

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 11:35:26

File name,Above stego threshold?,Secret message size in bytes (ignore for clean files),Primary Sets,Chi Square,Sample Pairs,RS analysis,Fusion (mean) 216343925_8b630d85e7.jpg,true,32968,NaN,0.01878110761071154,null,1.0,0.5093905538053558 2394208583_ff9796643c.jpg,true,14400,NaN,0.0043724597029599875,0.3081453226740609,0.29794424721074514,0.20348734319592202 374471450_ea5e79bb33_o.jpg,false,4778,8.167508797612827E-4,9.048488964201833E-4,0.024323408936645186,0.023259013474250217,0.012326005546769218 456151278_bdeb67508d_z.jpg,true,9244,NaN,0.06257047211695127,null,0.37229398336226643,0.21743222773960885

I will upload onto imgur right now

permalink

SpeedflyChris | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 12:34:54

I used StegExpose, and wouldn't it be odd for three to be positive?

Not especially. Try running it on some of your own pictures and I bet you'll find plenty of false positives.

permalink

WhatNowFred | 3 points | Nov 17 2016 13:22:45

Agreed. Try StegDetect instead. Better detection, with reliability indicator.

permalink

PraiseBeKEK | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 20:10:53

Why are you guys not getting anything?

permalink