readedited | 15 points | Nov 17 2016 01:29:55

Can someone explain why this wikileak about Laura Silsby is dated 2001

I thought she went down in 2010?

Also, it doesn't show who sent or received this

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3776

permalink

ExistentialEnso | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 01:46:58

My theory is that the data was missing and something/someone filled it in with 01/01/01.

permalink

readedited | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 02:00:11

I found an article http://thehollytree.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-is-all-blame-being-put-on-laura.html

"*NOW: Contrary to what is being reported, I have found THIS document dated January 21, 2001 from the Central Valley Baptist Church that Laura Silsby attended"

Link this blogger provided is broken though.

permalink

Bayou_Rougarou | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 01:34:00

Dated 2015 from what I saw. Am I missing something?

permalink

Igotaflashlight | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 01:37:29

look at the top date.

permalink

readedited | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 01:38:35

I see 2015 in the PDF but on the actual wikileak website it says 2001. Not sure if it was a typo or something

permalink

Bayou_Rougarou | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 01:57:08

If you go to the file directory on Wikileaks and click on podesta's (and some others I remember) emails, all of the emails say they were in 1984 (sometime in January I think)

Being serious. Not a troll.

permalink

PatrioticDeplo | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 15:24:27

What does this mean?

permalink

Igotaflashlight | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 01:37:14

" From: To: Date: 2001-01-01 03:00 Subject: NEW LIFE CHILDREN'S REFUGE - HAITIAN ORPHAN RESCUE MISSION "

permalink

101101101101101000 | 0 points | Nov 17 2016 01:45:46

that is just strange. wool being pulled over our eyes??

permalink