"It is curious. So far we don't know what to make of it." - Wikileaks Staff regarding the Pizzagate investigation.

palmsiberia | 37 points | Nov 16 2016 17:17:25

I'm not convinced that they were the Wikileaks team.

[deleted] | 7 points | Nov 16 2016 17:18:46

Agreed. Let's dive boys. Dig dig dig. I will look at all of their AMA responses and see if there are anomalies.

toastedmale | 6 points | Nov 16 2016 20:27:18

the whole AMA was kind of weird. it was either the staff who desperately tried to use it to get people to notice. but kinda didn't know how to talk to people

or it was someone pretending to be them and thats why the anwers were weird

DetroitFratParty | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 10:40:28

Thank you for your service

GitmoNationSlave | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 17:30:06

Then who? Someone who wants to stir the Pizzagate pot? How do those two conspiracies overlap? Who wants to control wikileaks yet stoke the flames of pizzagate?

snowmandan | 19 points | Nov 16 2016 18:04:31

Julian Assange has not been seen in over a month. There is rumor that he may have been taken and/or killed by NATO forces. Since the Ecuadorian embassy cut off his internet, there have been dozens of signs indicating that something is not right. No proof, but there are many anomalies and strange behavior being exhibited by these people.

GitmoNationSlave | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 18:07:06

I understand these concerns and am aware of them. It is a separate issue we are discussing. If wikileaks was compromised during the ama why make the comment? If TPTB is in control of wikileaks wouldn't the ignore the pizzagate question or deflect?

snowmandan | 6 points | Nov 16 2016 18:45:03

Because it would be more of a problem if they failed to recognize it at all. They said they're intrigued by it. IMO they are phrasing it to sound like a conspiracy or like it doesn't have significance or urgency. But clearly from all these connections and the lives at stake here and for the sake of justice, there MUST be a formal transparent investigation into this. This isn't something to be brushed off. Not something to be taken lightly. This is a very deep rabbit hole and we only need one smoking gun to expose everything.

GitmoNationSlave | 1 points | Nov 16 2016 18:50:22

It would not be more of a problem if a TPTB controlled wikileaks ignored that question and instead didnt comment on pizzagate at all. That is ridiculous.

[deleted] | 5 points | Nov 16 2016 17:51:14

Pizzagate points to drug and child trafficking around the world. Maybe this is what was in her emails.

GitmoNationSlave | 1 points | Nov 16 2016 18:05:25

My question is simple. If wikileaks was compromised during this AMA, why would they respond at all to this comment? Why acknowledge it? Unless you think an entity working along side the pizzagate investigation has control of wikileaks in which case why make such a vague comment? Why not go full support of the investigation?

[deleted] | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 18:15:47

They probably knew it was going to come out. I'm not 100% sure.

GitmoNationSlave | 1 points | Nov 16 2016 18:34:21

That doesn't explain why if wikileaks is compromised by TPTB they would comment on it at all... They could have easily ignored it.

[deleted] | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 18:42:16

Yeah. Hmmm. I can't tell. Why did they make such a ~~meaningless~~ vague comment?

GitmoNationSlave | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 18:47:24

You think that comment is meaningless???

"It is curious."

This sub is being attacked CONSTANTLY for finding this whole thing CURIOUS . Do you not see wikileak's publicly perceived legitimacy and their subsequent legitimate admission that the emails in question are curious is one of the strongest pillars of the investigation?

[deleted] | 2 points | Nov 16 2016 18:51:11

I didn't mean meaningless. I mean odd. They need to tell the public. They need to be informed if they haven't been already.

GitmoNationSlave | 1 points | Nov 16 2016 18:58:10

No. What would be odd is if TPTB controlled wikileaks, and then used that control to comment at all on pizzagate in a reddit AMA.

You are missing the point this whole comment thread stemmed from someone saying TPTB had control of wikileaks during the time of the AMA. My retort is that why the fuck would TPTB comment on pizzagate as wikileaks.... They wouldn't.

Now if wikileaks was in full control of their name and commented in a cryptic way, that is odd and very encouraging for the investigation.

Which leads me to believe wikileaks was not compromised or if they are its by an entity that is okay pushing pizzagate into the public.

Futakitty | 4 points | Nov 16 2016 18:37:13

Related : /r/WhereIsAssange

GitmoNationSlave | -6 points | Nov 16 2016 18:48:26

No. That is not related at all to this discussion. Why are you all derailing this comment?

TexasBorder | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 00:11:23

Then who? Someone who wants to stir the Pizzagate pot? How do those two conspiracies overlap? Who wants to control wikileaks yet stoke the flames of pizzagate?

He's responding to that so it is related to the reply in question.

endtimesarenear | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 00:19:07

Dan Rolle, who I believe worked as an operative for WL mentioned this and covered the timeline we've all been for the last months in a Periscope today, it's still there, if not it's on YouTube.

CatacystFPV | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 02:33:42

Honestly Wikileaks is Assange, and if I haven't heard what he's said himself, I don't buy it. I'm sure there's a "crew" over there that runs the show while he's in captivity, but I'm taking things with a grain of salt considering he IS the chief editor.

[deleted] | 1 points | Nov 17 2016 02:38:34

[deleted]

GitmoNationSlave | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 03:11:34

Depends on their motives for taking it over.

that_70s_kid | 2 points | Nov 17 2016 03:54:13

Assange is MIA for a month. An AMA has it to appear that everything is under control.