RecklessRatRedditor | 34 points
INVESTIGATE IMMEDIATELY. I do not like what I have seen on this site.The--Lodge | 4 points
Names of the "art" .. totally not pedophile-ly
foh
[deleted] | 3 points
http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/199384/slide_199384_508183_free.jpg
http://www.worldclassboxing.org/images/work/gaskell_proxy.jpg
So as long as you call it art no one can question it?
DepressedExplorer | 5 points
Just a far guess, but what if it IS art and the artist has no relation with this at all? Even less the place that shows his art?
[deleted] | 6 points
They have taught us that we are not allowed to question artists, and using the word "art" allows those with evil intention to hide behind our SJW mentality to not question it. Some medium has to be met.
DepressedExplorer | 5 points
Huh? Art is there to be questioned, that is most likely the intent of the artist as well. So far non of these images seem really sexual, the artist obviously is trying to say something about a most likely personal drama with them.
Maybe you never saw nude art or something? I see how a pedo might find these images interesting, because of his own projections, but with a clear mind i see no problem with them.
[deleted] | 1 points
Art is a diverse range of human activities in creating visual, auditory or performing artifacts (artworks), expressing the author's imaginative or technical skill, intended to be appreciated for their beauty or emotional power .
Nude art vs biting your arms off and standing with them on the floor smiling, those are different. And you are right, these I just don't see beauty in and would question someone if they found inspiration within some of these.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art
Art is an extension of someones mind, so it in essence gives you a better peak into their soul.
Bucket_Of_Losers | 1 points
no you use the sjw mentality and use it against them...call it offensive and give reasons why its offensive. act seriously offended and then call then out on it. Use their powers against them
RecklessRatRedditor | 4 points
Yeah, that is the most alarming image to me. This is not art. It is food for pedos.
leavenoprints | 4 points
I contacted an online organisation that deals with 'fucked up shit'. Found a pic on social media of a man with a real baby coming out of his anus and was told it was NOT an indecent image. It's called man birthing and because a load of feminazi/l/g/b/t bunch of half wits got behind it saying it was artistic and 'beautiful' (guy was gay) that it seemed to have been deemed art! Un-fucking real.
RecklessRatRedditor | 2 points
You can't be telling me you saw... no... that can't be real.
leavenoprints | 2 points
I genuinely did see that. It was a page that some fem/queer/man/thing was using to promote their own agenda and was around the time that a lot of fems were free bleeding (not wearing tampons etc and not giving a fuck where they bled) and I was looking through the media of this one fem and saw this picture. I was genuinely empty feeling when I saw it and thought the same as you. When I challenged her she and some other morons defended it saying something like "oh he'll never have a baby so why can't he do this?" I told her I was reporting her, she blocked me and I reported her to an online tip line. It was passed on to CEOP who came back with "This image has been reviewed and is not an indecent image". What. The. Fuck.
RecklessRatRedditor | 3 points
I am gonna need to get back into alcohol before I start researching if that is a legit thing. It had better not be. I will be pisse.d
leavenoprints | 2 points
Honestly don't. No amount of yawning puppies or giggling babies will make up for it.
leavenoprints | 1 points
Honestly don't. No amount of yawning puppies or giggling babies will make up for it.
leavenoprints | 1 points
Honestly don't. No amount of yawning puppies or giggling babies will make up for it.
FWAPTASTIC | 2 points
cmon dude really?
leavenoprints | 1 points
Yes really. That's not even the worst of what I have heard of or even seen. I'd rather you disbelieve me than go fuck your mind up looking for it.
FWAPTASTIC | 2 points
links or its bullshit
leavenoprints | 1 points
Go look for it. Then you'll realise that what I originally posted wasn't even the fucking worst of it. While you're there get some counselling and don't question me again.
FWAPTASTIC | 2 points
show YOUR SOURCE, im not going to go looking for that shit, i want to see what you read/saw directly, if not shut the fuck up with your bullshit, your what fucks up these things
leavenoprints | 1 points
Read the whole thing and you'll see the story. I don't know who the girl was with the image. It was on twitter. Believe what you like.
Edit: PS it's apparently called 'man birthing'. That's all I can give.
Milennial_Falcon | 2 points
What does this have to do with PizzaGate? If nothing, I have to assume this is a distraction/disinformation.
RecklessRatRedditor | 6 points
Tony podesta's favorite artist is this person ... He has the largest collection.
The--Lodge | 2 points
Indeed, this is very stange imagery - http://www.worldclassboxing.org/exhibit_gaskell.php
[deleted] | 2 points
This is probably the tenth site I've seen today that appears to be written in code. We should compile what we can find and see what is repeated often and fiddle around with it.
RecklessRatRedditor | 1 points
Good thinking... Wanna post some similar labguaged sites you are talking about here?
megalodon90 | 1 points
In the contact section:
Dennis Scholl
Desiree Cronk
See if they are connected to the podestas/alefantis
WHOIS for worldclassboxing.org
Source: whois.arin.net
IP Address: 97.74.144.103
Name: GO-DADDY-COM-LLC
Handle: NET-97-74-0-0-1
Registration Date: 8/14/08
Range: 97.74.0.0-97.74.255.255
Org: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Org Handle: GODAD
Address: 14455 N Hayden Road Suite 226
City: Scottsdale
State/Province: AZ
Postal Code: 85260
Country: UNITED STATES
Sockz92 | 4 points | Nov 11 2016 16:41:55
Can you ellaborate further?
permalink
RecklessRatRedditor | 8 points | Nov 11 2016 16:43:12
http://www.worldclassboxing.org/exhibit_gaskell.php
this would be Tony Podesta's favorite artist.
permalink
DepressedExplorer | -1 points | Nov 11 2016 17:47:48
therefore?
permalink
RecklessRatRedditor | 3 points | Nov 11 2016 19:06:02
who are the kids in the pictures? I just find it disturbing that the is an image of a frightened looking girl getting her face grabbed by the 'photographer' while her top is drooping open. forgive me if I am being sensitive.
permalink
chayesdigital | 1 points | Nov 12 2016 04:13:26
I think we need to expand the boundaries of 'art'. Using John Podestas face, turn it nice and mushy and red rubbing it along a canvas (the street). I will gladly hang those pictures in my home.
permalink